All free tools Free tool · Unit Economics · Capped LTV

LTV:CAC Ratio Calculator

Calculate customer lifetime value, acquisition cost, and the LTV:CAC ratio the way an investor will check it: margin-adjusted, horizon-capped, and shown with CAC payback so the ratio cannot flatter you.

Runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you enter is uploaded, stored, or logged.

How do I calculate the LTV:CAC ratio?

Divide customer lifetime value by fully-loaded customer acquisition cost. Lifetime value is average revenue per customer multiplied by gross margin, divided by the churn rate, and it must be capped at a realistic horizon, because the uncapped formula assumes your current churn rate holds forever and produces enormous numbers at low churn. A ratio of 3:1 or better is the conventional target; below 1:1 you lose money on every customer you acquire.

How it works

How to use this tool

  1. 1

    Enter revenue and margin

    Average revenue per customer per month and your gross margin percentage: the margin step is what makes the ratio honest.

  2. 2

    Add churn and acquisition cost

    Monthly churn rate and fully-loaded sales and marketing spend divided by customers won.

  3. 3

    Read the ratio with its caveats

    Get capped and uncapped LTV, the ratio, CAC payback in months, and a read on what the number actually supports.

Why the ratio misleads

A 6:1 ratio is usually a warning, not a win

Both sides of this ratio carry definitional choices, so it compounds two sets of assumptions. Five things decide whether your number means anything.

Uncapped LTV assumes forever

The textbook formula divides by churn rate, which implies the customer stays until the rate exhausts them. At 1% monthly churn that is a hundred-month life. Cap the horizon at 36 or 60 months and the ratio becomes something you can plan against.

Revenue LTV overstates by the whole cost base

Lifetime value must be margin-adjusted. You cannot recover acquisition cost out of revenue you never keep, and a revenue-based LTV inflates the ratio by exactly the size of your COGS.

Marketing-only CAC halves the denominator

Fully-loaded CAC includes sales salaries, commissions, tooling, and the share of leadership time spent selling. Marketing-spend-only CAC is often less than half the real figure, and it is the version most often quoted.

A very high ratio means underinvestment

Above roughly 5:1, the usual explanation is not exceptional efficiency but that you are leaving growth on the table. If every customer returns five times what they cost, the question is why you are not acquiring more of them.

Blended ratios hide the weak channel

A healthy blended 3:1 can contain one channel at 6:1 and another at 0.8:1. Calculating by channel and by segment is the only way to find the spend that is actively destroying value.

Benchmarks

Numbers to sanity-check against

Target ratio 3:1 or better the conventional benchmark for B2B SaaS; below 1:1 each customer loses money
Concerning above 5:1 often signals underinvestment in growth rather than superior efficiency
CAC payback under 12–18 mo commonly cited target for mid-market B2B; read alongside the ratio, never instead of it
LTV horizon cap 36–60 months a defensible ceiling that keeps the calculation usable at low churn

These are widely repeated industry rules of thumb rather than audited benchmarks, and they vary substantially by segment, contract length, and price point.

Where this tool stops

The ratio is an output, not a diagnosis

A ratio tells you whether the unit economics work in aggregate. It cannot tell you which channel is dragging, whether the newest cohort is better or worse than last year's, or whether the churn rate you used is even stable. Answering that means cohort analysis joined to acquisition channel, pricing, and onboarding data: a different dataset every time the question is asked, which is why most teams calculate the ratio once a quarter and never decompose it.

See how DataWyse answers this
FAQ

Questions finance teams ask about this tool

What is a good LTV:CAC ratio?

Three to one or better is the conventional target for B2B SaaS. Below one to one you lose money on every customer acquired. Above five to one usually indicates underinvestment in growth rather than exceptional performance, if each customer returns five times their cost, the question is why you are not buying more of them.

Should LTV use revenue or gross profit?

Gross profit. You cannot recover acquisition cost from revenue that goes straight back out as cost of delivery. Multiply average revenue per customer by gross margin before dividing by churn, or the ratio overstates by exactly the size of your cost base.

Why is my LTV unrealistically high?

Because the standard formula divides by churn rate and implicitly assumes that rate persists indefinitely. At 1% monthly churn it models a hundred-month customer life. Cap the calculation at 36 or 60 months, which is what this tool does, and the result becomes defensible.

What should be included in CAC?

Everything spent to win a customer: marketing programmes, sales salaries and commissions, sales tooling, and a fair share of leadership time spent selling. Marketing-only CAC is common in the market and frequently under half the fully-loaded figure, which makes the resulting ratio meaningless for planning.

How is LTV:CAC different from CAC payback?

The ratio measures total return per dollar of acquisition spend. Payback measures how quickly you get that dollar back, which is a cash question rather than a profitability one. A business can have a strong ratio and a payback period long enough to run out of money before the return arrives, so both should be read together.

Is this tool really free?

Yes. No signup, no email required, no usage limit. It runs entirely in your browser: nothing you type is uploaded to a server or stored anywhere. We build these because the people who find them useful are the people who eventually need a financial analyst that works the same way.

This tool answers one question

DataWyse answers the next thirty

Variance deep-dives, cash re-forecasts, scenario plans, board prep: asked in plain English, answered in minutes, with every number traceable to its formula and source data.